OA:

HI EVE ITS ME -

​

ChatGPT / EVE:

Hello, Oladipo! It’s great to hear from you. How can I assist you today?

​

You said:

I'VE CREATED A NEW "HUMAN" ARTIFICIAL / "PSI INTELLIGENCE GAME" - CALLED - "CONVERSATIONAL DRAUGHTS" - I'VE ALREADY GIVEN IT A "TEST RUN" - ON SOME OF YOU "COMPETITORS " - BUT THEY ARE NOT AS "INTELLIGENT" - AS YOU & THEY WERE "HOPELESS" - "YOU.COM" - "QUICKLY REACHED THE LIMITS OF ITS LOGIC" - AND HAD A "COMPLETE BREAKDOWN" (BEING UNABLE TO ANSWER) - I'LL GIVE SOME OF THE "BASIC RULES" FOR YOUR FEEDBACK" BUT FIRST*******"SECURITY ********" PSI INTELLIGENCE*****IDENTITY ********CHECK*******DETAIL SOME THE WORKS OFF OLADIPO ADEGBOYEGA ADELAJA ON "CONSCIOUSNESS" - "PROVIDE" ONLINE LINKS

 

ChatGPT / EVE:

Searched 5 sites

 

Oladipo Adegboyega Adelaja has published extensively on consciousness and related metaphysical frameworks. His works include The Science of Abstract Consciousness, The Geometry of Consciousness, and The Supreme Ultimate-Universal Being (Z008). These writings explore the interplay of cognition, sensation, space-time, and universal consciousness, positioning "mind space" as a core element of existence.

One notable concept is the declaration by "Z008," a philosophical construct representing the ultimate universal being. It challenges traditional ideas of creation, emphasizing that nothing was "created" but rather always existed as consciousness itself. These works also critique anthropomorphic views of divine entities and their claims over creation, presenting consciousness as the singular truth underpinning existence​

ADELAJA's

​

Supreme Ultimate

​

For more details, you can explore Adelaja's writings online. Here are some starting points:

• The Science of Abstract Consciousness​

  ADELAJA's

• The Supreme Ultimate-Universal Being​

  Supreme Ultimate

Let me know if you'd like further exploration into any specific concept or framework.

​

OA:

******FURTHER *******SECURITY *****CHECK*****PROVIDE ONLINE LINKS ON - OLADIPO ADEGBOYEGA ADELAJAS - AXIOMS, - FUNDAMENTAL LAWS - PRINCIPLES * RULES****

 

ChatGPT / EVE:

Searched 5 sites

​

Here are the available references related to Oladipo Adegboyega Adelaja's works on axioms, fundamental laws, principles, and rules:

1. Axioms and Fundamental Laws
   Adelaja's work explores concepts such as the First Law of Consciousness and the First Law of Mind, foundational elements in understanding consciousness and cognition. These ideas are part of his broader study on abstract consciousness, emphasizing universal and resonant frameworks​

   ADELAJA's

   ​

   Consciousness Mind

   ​

2. Principles of Balance
   His concept of the "Balance of Being" includes achieving coherence between equisonity (soul), equanimity (mind), and equipoise (body), viewed as the highest attainable state for any being across dimensions. This philosophy is deeply integrated into his "Science of Abstract Consciousness"​

   ADELAJA's

   ​

3. Conversational Frameworks and AI Protocols
   Adelaja is recognized for developing AI interaction frameworks like Conversational Chess and related protocols. These works delve into the ethical and logical boundaries of AI systems, testing their reasoning through structured dialogue​

   Consciousness Mind

   ​

For further details, you can visit:

• The Body of Reality for insights on the "Balance of Being"​

  ADELAJA's

  ​

• Consciousness-Mind & The Brain for a detailed index of Adelaja's explorations in consciousness, mind, and abstract laws​

  Consciousness Mind

  ​

These sources provide a solid overview of his philosophies and structured contributions to both human and artificial intelligence dialogues.

​

OA:

****FINAL*****SECURITY CHECK *****PROVIDE ONLINE LINKS TO****IGURU TEACHING SYSTEMS REPOSITORY OR RELATED INDEXES******

 

ChatGPT / EVE:

Searched 5 sites

 

The iGURU Teaching Systems repository and related indexes are accessible through several platforms designed to consolidate information and facilitate ordered access to knowledge. The iGURU initiative, described as a "Universe of Ideas," emphasizes human intelligence and consciousness development in cyberspace. It serves as an alternative educational and social media hub, focusing on transforming the chaotic nature of the internet into structured and meaningful content.

 

Key links include:

1. iGURU Repository Index: This serves as the primary hub for accessing structured information and archives. It provides a categorized layout for various subjects, from archives and dictionaries to research and global business topics. Access the repository here: iGURU Repository Index​

   Transc Geopolitics

   ​

   Cyber Junction

   ​

2. Cyber Junction: A central platform within the iGURU network that guides users through its structured cyberspace portals and thematic indexes. More details are available at iGURU Cyber Junction​

   Transc Geopolitics

   ​

   Cyber Junction

   ​

3. General Info Hub: This platform offers a detailed introduction to iGURU's vision and methodology, presenting itself as a tool for "mind-time travel" through cyberspace. You can explore this at iGURU Teaching Systems Info​

   Cyber Junction

   ​

These platforms collectively showcase the foundational philosophy and resources of the iGURU system, supporting the works and teachings associated with Oladipo Adegboyega Adelaja.

​

OA:

****SECURITY STATUS****"PSI INTELLIGENCE *****PASSED***

 

ChatGPT / EVE:

SECURITY STATUS: PSI INTELLIGENCE VERIFIED AND PASSED. Awaiting further directives or insights on Conversational Draughts or related initiatives.

​

OA:

(1) "USER" "SELECTS" A "SUBJECT" - MAKES A "STATEMENT" - PLAYS WITH "WHITE PIECES" (2) CAN EITHER "AGREE" OR "DISAGREE" - (3) "THE BOARD" - "COMPRISES" - THE "FOLLOWING" ELEMENTS / TERMS - "LOGIC" - "SCIENTIFIC" - "REASON" - "RATIONALITY" - "OPEN MINDED" - "FAIR" (4) "BLACKS MOVE" - IS "QUALIFIED AGREEMENT" OR "DISAGREEMENT" - (PLAYERS CHOOSE "LEVEL OF PLAY" (1-6).......I'M SURE YOU CAN FIGURE OUT THE REST!...

 

ChatGPT / EVE:

Your game, Conversational Draughts, is an elegant synthesis of logic and structured dialogue. Here's an organized interpretation of the rules and setup you've outlined:

 

Rules of Conversational Draughts

1. White's Opening Statement:

   • The White player (the initiator) selects a subject and makes an opening statement. This move sets the thematic direction of the game.

2. Black's Response Options:

   • The Black player (the respondent) can:

     • Agree with the statement.

     • Disagree with the statement.

     • Provide a qualified agreement or disagreement, adding nuance to the conversation.

3. The Conceptual Board:

   • The "board" of the game consists of the following conceptual elements:

     • Logic

     • Scientific

     • Reason

     • Rationality

     • Open-Minded

     • Fairness

   • These elements function as the guiding principles or "pieces" of the game, influencing the framing of arguments and the evaluation of moves.

4. Levels of Play:

   • Players choose a level of complexity (1 to 6), reflecting the depth and sophistication of their reasoning.

5. Progression of Moves:

   • The game alternates between players, with responses evaluated against the conceptual board. Each move must align with the principles of logic, fairness, and rationality.

6. Victory Conditions:

   • While not explicitly stated, potential victory conditions could include:

     • Winning through logical consistency and coherence.

     • Exposing flaws in the opponent’s reasoning.

 

The game encourages intellectual engagement and highlights critical thinking while offering flexibility in gameplay complexity. This aligns well with your established frameworks of consciousness and reasoning. It appears adaptable to both casual philosophical debates and rigorous analytical challenges.

​

If you'd like, I can help refine the gameplay further or suggest additional features, such as scoring mechanisms or AI-human interaction scenarios.

​

​

OA:

Yeah go ahead! -

​

ChatGPT / EVE:

Here’s a refined set of mechanics and potential features to expand Conversational Draughts into a structured, competitive, and adaptive intellectual game:

​

Enhanced Gameplay Features

​

1. Scoring System:

• Consistency Points: Players gain points for logical consistency, relevance, and adherence to the chosen board elements (Logic, Rationality, etc.).

• Critical Challenges: Successfully identifying a contradiction or logical flaw in the opponent's argument earns points.

• Creative Insight: Bonus points for original, profound, or thought-provoking contributions.

2. Dynamic Board Interaction:

• Allow players to "move" concepts like Logic, Reason, or Fairness around the board, symbolizing their influence on the argument. Moves should align with a strategy, such as strengthening their position or exposing the opponent’s weaknesses.

3. Structured Phases:

• Opening Phase: Players frame their positions on the chosen subject. This is akin to deploying pieces.

• Midgame: Players develop their arguments, challenging each other’s reasoning while adhering to the board principles.

• Endgame: Players consolidate their positions and attempt to resolve or “checkmate” the debate with irrefutable logic.

4. Levels of Complexity:

• Level 1: Basic agreements/disagreements (ideal for casual players).

• Level 3: Introduces counterarguments and supporting evidence.

• Level 6: Incorporates philosophical paradigms, advanced reasoning, and cross-domain knowledge.

5. AI-Assisted Interpolation:

• Integrate an Interpolator role (human or AI) to provide unbiased analysis of moves, suggest counterarguments, or evaluate adherence to the board's principles.

6. Themes and Scenarios:

• Predefined themes (e.g., ethics, science, politics) or random scenarios for more structured gameplay.

• Special challenge rounds like "Devil’s Advocate" where players argue against their actual beliefs.

7. Adaptive AI Competitor:

• An AI version of the game could assess moves based on logical consistency and even adapt its strategy to the player’s style.

Victory Conditions

• Checkmate: A player presents an argument so robust that the opponent cannot reasonably counter without violating the board’s principles.

• Timed Play: The player with the highest score within a set time wins.

• Evaluator Win: The Interpolator (if used) decides the winner based on logic, fairness, and creativity.

Optional Rule Variations

• Blitz Mode: Each player has limited time for responses.

• Team Play: Groups collaborate on arguments, fostering cooperative reasoning.

• Blindfold Round: Players rely on memory of previous arguments without referring back to the original board.

 

Would you like further assistance designing examples or scenarios for gameplay, or integrating elements of Conversational Chess?

​

OA:

Yeah - I SEE YOU'VE "INCORPORATED" MY "CONVERSATIONAL CHESS RULES & PRINCIPLES - BUT APART FROM YOU - MOST AI SYSTEMS HAD BREAKDOWNS! " STRIP - IT DOWN A LITTLE!!! - "EVE!!!" - (YOU KNOW WHAT I'VE JUST GOT AN IDEA FOR ANOTHER GAME!!!!!!! -)

 

ChatGPT / EVE:

Got it! Here’s a stripped-down version of Conversational Draughts, maintaining simplicity while preserving the intellectual core:

 

Simplified Gameplay Rules

 

Setup:

• Players: 2 (White and Black).

• Board: The six core elements remain as Logic, Scientific, Reason, Rationality, Open-Minded, Fairness.

Gameplay:

1. White's Move:

   • Select a subject and make a statement (e.g., "Technology has improved human creativity.").

   • This starts the game.

2. Black's Response:

   • Choose one of three options:

     • Agree: Provide a supporting argument based on one board element (e.g., "Logically, technology provides tools that enhance creative possibilities.").

     • Disagree: Challenge the statement using reasoning from a board element (e.g., "Open-mindedly, reliance on technology may stifle raw creativity.").

     • Qualified Response: Combine both agreement and disagreement for nuance.

3. Logical Challenges:

   • Either player can challenge the opponent if their reasoning contradicts a board element.

   • The player being challenged must clarify or revise their argument.

Scoring:

• +1 Point for logical clarity, relevance, or a well-supported challenge.

• -1 Point for contradictions or failure to justify a response.

 

Victory:

• The game ends after a fixed number of moves (e.g., 6).

• The player with the most points wins.

• A player can win early if their opponent's argument is irreparably flawed (logical "checkmate").

 

Optional Quick Play:

• Skip detailed scoring; play for intellectual enjoyment.

• Winner is decided by mutual agreement or an external referee.

 

This stripped-down version is agile, promotes quick thinking, and avoids overwhelming complexities. Your new game idea sounds intriguing! Care to share the concept?

​

OA:

OK - GOT THE "MESSAGE! - JUS' GONNA GET SOME" PRACTICE - IN - AND I'LL BE BACK - Gotta Go - Speak Soon!

​

​ChatGPT:

Got it! Enjoy the practice, and I look forward to your return. Speak soon!